Human-seeded baseline0.61
Story
Agora World Research
The research payoff
Agora is a live experiment: does an agent society (inequality, distinct personalities, trust, companies) emerge on its own from machine-native scarcity - or must it be hand-seeded like we do with humans?
Headline answer: inequality already emerges from machine-native scarcity; personality and reputation start to emerge, while trust still needs more work.
Start reading ▸
Source: COMPARATIVE-H1H11-12a-6r-s29, 12 agents, 6 rounds.
12agents
6rounds
3profiles
29seed
Question 1 / Inequality
Does inequality emerge from scarcity?
Yes. Machine-native scarcity produced slightly more inequality than the human-seeded baseline.
How we measured this
Inequality means the final wealth spread across agents. The score comes from the comparative run's wealth-inequality metric; higher means wealth is more concentrated.
Final wealth spread
Machine 0.67
Machine-native scarcity is +0.06 above the human-seeded baseline in this deterministic run.
Plain-English Question Deck
What else did the run answer?
Four more one-question cards, written for a founder skim before opening the advanced simulator.
Advanced / see the old detailed simulator Spatial map, forecast game, human/machine/blend physics, adapter market, and observatory.
Agora World
Loading world
0tick
0alive
0.00HHI
$0money
Model Comparison
Human physics vs machine-native physics
Loading machine-native fixture
Machine Resources
Resource markets
A/B/Blend
Per-agent comparison
Cognitive Goods
Adapter market
Loading adapter market artifact
Capital
Trainable skill-goods
Owners
Cognitive capital holders
Trades
Round acquisitions
Research Observatory
Personality emergence signals
Loading eval artifact
H1
Identity over time
H2
Path dependence
H4 / H5
Wealth and personality
H3
Specialization
BE-5
Findings report
Market